Every change goes through the review, sandbox, and rollback discipline a senior engineer would insist on — no matter who wrote it.
SOC 2 Type I
Data encrypted in transit and at rest
SSO/SAML support
Role-based access control
Lightsprint works with complex codebases across multiple repositories. Connect them, and it learns your conventions before proposing anything.
Nothing touches production directly
Every change is built and tested in a sandboxed copy of your environment first. Production is never edited in place - there's no path that skips this step.
A human always signs off
AI drafts and checks the change, but nothing ships without approval. You decide who signs off — engineer, lead, specific role — and they see a plain-English summary plus the actual diff first.
Every action is logged and attributable
Who proposed, reviewed, and approved a change, and when it shipped — logged automatically, not maintained by hand. It's the trail your auditors ask for, generated as a byproduct of normal use.
Every change can be undone in one click
Rollback isn't a ticket or a redeploy. It's a control in the same interface the change shipped from, available to whoever has permission to use it.
Permissions are set per role, not per person. Roles map to your existing org structure - no new permissions model to build.
Can propose changes and view previews. Cannot approve or ship.
Can review, request changes, and approve. Typically an engineer or lead.
Manages roles, integrations, and environment access.
Can a non-engineer ship directly to production without review?
No. Every change routes through the approval step your team configures; there is no bypass.
What happens if a change breaks something after it ships?
No. Every change routes through the approval step your team configures; there is no bypass.
Does LightSprint send our code to external AI providers?
needs a real, specific answer
Can we require review from a specific person or team?
Yes, approval rules are configurable per role.
What's logged, and for how long?
needs a real, specific answer
How is this different from just requiring PR review in GitHub?
LightSprint enforces the same review discipline for people who don't work in GitHub at all — the gate exists regardless of whether they know what a PR is.